|
|
||||||||
Who owns software? That question is at the heart of one of the most complex and important public policy questions facing policy makers in Europe and around the world. In late September, the European parliament voted to approve a new directive that would, for the first time, grant patents to new and innovative software. Yet the vote did not come without controversy. Advocates of open source software argued that the law granted too much power to large, corporate patent holders. They suggest that software be governed only by copyright protection that promotes greater sharing and innovation by all software users. Others counter that current intellectual property laws are vital to create an incentive for future technological innovation. The issue has not been resolved. Yet we know that because software plays such a central role in almost all aspects of business, technology, and innovation, the question of how its intellectual property ought to be protected will remain a critical and contentious issue. To consider this question we have invited two thoughtful observers of the evolution of software who bring very different perspectives: a leader in the European open source software movement and a careful analyst of the industry who can put today's pressing questions about patents in a historical context .
|
Debate will be moderated by Brian Carney of the Wall Street
Journal Europe. |
|||||||
|
||||||||